CycleBetter.Com!

The G-Rant : Grant's Rants on Adventure Racing

“Without adventure, civilization is in full decay.” - Alfred North Whitehead

Handlebar Bags For Weight Management ?

Team HRAdventure is racing in Georgia in a couple weeks and, in reviewing the mandatory gear list, I started thinking about the weight of my pack.  While the course is secret, for a 30-hour race I can guess the following distances/times:
  • Paddling: 25 miles or 5 hours (give or take -- hopefully less in our Sundowner canoe!_
  • Trekking: 25 miles or 10 hours (give or take)
  • Biking: 40 miles or 15 hours (give or take)
Obviously, these are just my guesses based on prior races and elevation, weather, density of vegetation, quality of trails, and other factors will all play in to this.

Now, for the Paddling legs I won't need to be carrying a pack; my drybag will handle it; weight isn't such a concern while in the boat.  For the Trekking and Biking legs, however, weight is an issue.  We're required to have a fleece top, midweight pants and bottoms, waterproof layers, and some other things that will add bulk and weight to our load.  Besides the mandatory race gear, I'm going to be bringing plenty of water -- water is by far the heaviest thing in my pack -- and food.  There's no reprieve for the Trekking leg; I'll have to shoulder the load 100% for the duration of the hiking/running/crawling. 

When Biking, however, I have some other options.  Anything I can do to lighten the load on my back will be very welcome around hour 20 of the race.  I considered putting my entire pack on a platform mounted above the rear bike wheel, but this would take some engineering ingenuity and I'm not sure I like the idea of doing something that dramatic.  Instead, I've warmed to the idea of a handlebar pack that could hold some of the items that would otherwise be in my backpack.  I'm thinking food and maybe a hat and glovees and some other items -- nothing too heavy to throw my biking off balance, but maybe a pound or two worth of stuff.  Small things like this can make a real difference after several hours of riding!

On a quick online search, I turned up this handlebar pack that has a map sleeve built in.  Interesting.  Ortlieb has a few handlebar bags to choose from.  Also interesting, but pricier.

As I see it, these are the pros and cons to using a handlebar bag:

Pros
  • Offset some weight from my back
  • Easy access to items in the handlebar bag
  • Map case mounted on the bag (so Mike can use the Axis Gear bike map case exclusively)
Cons
  • Changes the weight of my bike more to the front
  • More crap to potentially mess with brakes and shifters and bike lights
  • Added complexity (something else that can break) and remembering what is stored where.  In a race, there is a lot to be said for simplicity!
I'm going to swing by the bike shop and see what my options are.


Comments

Eric (Team Richmond ASR) said:

I would go with a seatpost rack like this one, http://www.topeak.com/products/rack_001.html. It can handle up to 20lbs, I've seen one with at least 15lbs going through Richmond singletrack.

# January 26, 2006 9:28 PM

The G-Rant : Grant's Rants on Adventure Racing said:

I've been busy since my last post on mountain biking with a handlebar bag. 
This was the final...
# January 30, 2006 11:29 AM

TimWhite said:

I'm with Eric recommending the seatpost rack. Even a small amount of weight above the front wheel messes up handling remarkably. But don't consign all your pack weight to the rear rack. That will throw handling off as well.

For commuting I use a rack pack and what the Brits call a bum bag. But I probably don't have to deal with as much weight as you do, even if I go for the large lunch.

Weight on your back increases strain on your body. It also increases saddle pressure. But weight on you moves with you. You'll have to find the right distribution to meet your individual needs.
# February 2, 2006 9:52 AM
Sign in | Join | Help

in Search

Google